In the Current Year, we are all supposed to believe that America Was Never Great—but did you know America is also responsible for the six million Jews that we are told perished in the Holocaust? And the only way to atone for this sin is immigration.

First of all, you should understand that, in the mind of the Cultural Marxist, Western Civilization as a whole is responsible for everything bad that ever happened in the world, as well as the reason that “developing” countries can’t seem to make any progress today. None of the achievements, inventions or advances made by the West can even begin to make up for the unmitigated reign of terror White people have inflicted on the rest of the world.

This is the reason that explicit Whiteness, i.e. taking pride in being White, being concerned about White interests, is labeled “White Supremacy” and “Neo-Nazism.” When White people get together anywhere, they naturally morph into Nazis. This is why we need diversity in Western countries and Western countries only. The aim of diversity is not ostensible cultural enrichment, or to make Whites a minority. It is intended to blend and breed White people out of existence entirely. And this is a good thing according to our Jewish friends Susan and Noel.

So how can it be that Americans, who fought against the Nazis in WWII, at the same time bear responsibility for the deaths of the six million? According to Mark Hetfield, President and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), which works on behalf of the American Jewish community and is the oldest international refugee resettlement organization in the United States, restrictive U.S. immigration policies prevented Jewish refugees from escaping Germany and fleeing to the U.S. in the 1930s. They were trapped in Germany, subsequently rounded up, put in concentration camps and, well…we all know what happened next.

The staunchly pro-refugee/immigration stance is not unique to Jews in America. Jews are driving the herd of refugees/immigrants to Europe and all other Western nations, because as Hetfield claims, they know what it feels like to be run out of town and have no place to go. How thoughtful of them!

What Carlson should have asked Hetfield is: If refugees are so close to the Jewish heart, why hasn’t Israel taken in any refugees from Syria, which is right next to Israel? The Geneva conventions state that those fleeing must seek asylum in the first safe country they come to. Furthermore, if Israel is so concerned about helping Muslim refugees, why does Israel treat Palestinians like vermin that require extermination? What exactly is the difference between a refugee from Palestine and a refugee from Syria, Iraq or Afghanistan?

Does anyone else see the glaring contradiction here?

If Israel claims that taking in refugees would expose it to violence and potential acts of terrorism, then why should we think the results will be any different when refugees are given asylum in Western countries?

Hetfield admits that refugees have never been popular with the American public, but defends the actions of his organization—which goes against what polls show the majority of Americans want—because this is an issue that is very important to Jewish people, who comprise less than 3% of the U.S. population. In a pure democracy, 3% of people would command 3% of the power. But the reality is, Jews are massively over-represented in all major U.S. institutions, especially the ones that really matter: finance, politics (AIPAC), law, mass media, academia, and of course, Hollywood, the source of all our culture and identity myths. Not that there is anything wrong with that, right?

Or is there?

Surely, if having a minority of outsiders (who view themselves as genetically different and culturally separate from the majority population) control all the most important institutions in a society created problems, there would be some evidence, no? For example, a history of being persecuted and blamed for social ills, perhaps? Or how about negative stereotypes? Discrimination?

All of us Gentiles are familiar with their sob stories: Slaves in Egypt. Lost tribes scattered to the four corners of the Earth. And the really big one: The Shoah™. But did you know that Jews have been run out of one place or another in Europe 109 times over the past 1,800 years? Apparently for doing absolutely nothing wrong, if you’re inclined to take their word for it.

The Left, pro-refugee and immigration folks love to tell us that America is a nation of immigrants, a melting pot of different cultures (diversity is our strength!). But is this true? Here is a brief history of actual immigration in the U.S.

Immigration Policy 1790-1920
The earliest immigration law on the books was the 1790 Naturalization Act, which excluded non-White people from being eligible to naturalize. Naturalization requirements included two years of residence in the country, “good moral character” and that the applicant be a “free white person.” Subsequent immigration laws were intended to detain, relocate or deport alien enemies during war or people otherwise deemed dangerous to the United States, as well as to encourage immigrants for labor due to shortages after the Civil War. In 1875, the Asian Exclusion Act was passed, the first restrictive legislation barring the immigration of criminals and laborers from Asian countries. A similar law was passed in 1882 specifically to ban Chinese, and for most of the next forty years, immigration policy would be focused on restricting who could immigrate to the United States.

A Reinterpretation of American Liberty
In 1883, Jewish poet Emma Lazarus wrote her most famous work, The New Colossus. This sonnet was inscribed on a bronze plaque installed on the Statue of Liberty in 1903. It includes the famous lines:

Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

The Statue of Liberty, a gift from France dedicated in 1886 symbolizing liberty enlightening the world, an icon of freedom and the United States, had been turned into a welcome mat for the wretched refuse of the world. This is one reason Americans think the U.S. has a moral obligation to take in refugees, despite the actual history of immigration in the U.S.

Melting Pots and Bolsheviks
About the time Lazarus penned her sonnet, large numbers of Jewish refugees began arriving in the United States, fleeing pogroms in Russia and Eastern Europe. As ever, the Jews were being persecuted and run out of the nations they had adopted for no reason whatsoever. Funny how we only ever hear what was done to the Jews, but never the all-important why.

In 1908, British-born Israel Zangwill, a child of Jewish immigrants from Russia, wrote a play called The Melting Pot popularizing the notion that

America is God’s Crucible, the great Melting-Pot where all the races of Europe are melting and reforming…Germans and Frenchmen, Irishmen and Englishmen, Jews and Russians—into the Crucible with you all! God is making the American.

Jewish origins are in the Middle East, not Europe. Like the melting pot and wretched refuse memes, the notion that America is a nation of immigrants is a Jewish invention. And it is clearly a lie, as we see immigrants and refugees in the U.S. and Europe today have no intention of assimilating into the majority culture.

In 1917, the Bolshevik Revolution brought catastrophic changes to Russia, where Marxist Socialists led by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov overthrew the Tsarist autocracy and seized the instruments of state power. Who were the Bolsheviks? In the words of Alexander Solzhenitsyn, “We cannot state that all Jews are Bolsheviks. But—without Jews, there would never have been Bolshevism.” But wait—weren’t the poor innocent Jews supposed to be fleeing Russia because of the pogroms?

Immigration Policy 1921–1965
In 1921, laws were passed that created numerical “national origins” quotas for immigration based on nationality (3% of the foreign-born population of that nationality according to the 1910 census) and total annual immigration was capped at 350,000. Nationality quotas did not apply to countries in the Western Hemisphere.

The outbreak of World War I in 1914 resulted in a surge of Jewish refugees from Eastern Europe, an estimated 138,000 just in the first year of the war alone. American Jews pressured the government to ease restrictions on Jewish immigrants. Rather than bowing to that pressure, in 1924 a new, more restrictive, immigration law (The Johnson-Reed Act) lowered quotas (to 2% of the foreign-born population of that nationality according to the 1890 census) and reduced the immigration cap to 165,000 people. This law favored Northern and Western European nations, while restricting immigration from Southern and Eastern European nations. In particular, the law aimed to restrict immigration by Italians and Eastern European Jews. It also severely restricted immigration by Africans and banned immigration by Arabs and Asians. According to the U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian, the purpose of the act was “to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity.” In the words of historian John Higham, “racially inferior” immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe was “polluting the nation’s bloodstream.”

Despite Jewish interloping, immigration in the U.S. was limited primarily to White, European people—the founding stock of America. Non-White immigrants and refugees were severely restricted, if not banned outright. These laws remained in place throughout World War II and the post-war years, until the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.

The Hart-Celler Act
The 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, proposed by Jewish Congressman Emanuel Celler (D-NY) and co-sponsored by Senator Philip Hart (D-MI), abolished the quota system that had been in place since the 1920s. For the first time in U.S. history, immigration from the Western Hemisphere was limited. Refugees were granted special preference and given priority akin to those with special skills and relatives of U.S. citizens.

The Hart-Celler Act changed the ethnic makeup of immigration and significantly increased the number of immigrants to the U.S., who accounted for 11% of U.S. population growth the 1960s, 30% of population growth in the 1970s and 39% of population growth in the 1980s. This growth was mainly driven by Immigrants from Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Southern and Eastern Europe—regions whose people had been restricted or banned for most of U.S. history.

At the time it was signed into law, President Lyndon B. Johnson said the bill is “not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions.” Other politicians said the bill would not affect the U.S. demographic mix. I was born in the late 1960s, when Whites represented 88% of the U.S. population. 50 years after the Hart-Celler Act became law, Whites accounted for about 70% of the U.S. population. In 2012, for the first time ever, non-White babies accounted for more than half the births in the U.S. At the current pace of immigration and birth rate trends, Whites will become an absolute minority in the country they built by the year 2040, if not sooner.

Talk about a revolutionary act that affects the lives of millions of people and has changed the demographic mix of the U.S. population! Of course, no one could have predicted it.

Conclusion
At the beginning of the above video, Tucker Carlson asks Mark Hetfield to define American values. Hetfield responds with Jewish values. In fact, Jewish values, interests and worldview have come to dominate virtually every aspect of American life, and this is by design. We have been conditioned to adopt the values of outsiders as our own, which may prove to be a fatal misstep.

Given the history of immigration policy in the United States, it should be clear that the U.S. is not and never was a nation of immigrants in the way it is characterized by the Left today. Rather, as I have attempted to show, policies have always focused on carefully controlling who and how many came in, with an emphasis on preserving American homogeneity.

Refugees have no Constitutional or moral right to seek asylum in the U.S. Shouldn’t Americans come first? Shouldn’t we look after our own poor, starving and ill citizens before dedicating those resources to someone who doesn’t share our values?

American values come from the men who built America, not subversive outsiders who don’t have the best interests of White America (still the majority, by the way) at heart. Most of the ideas we were taught growing up, like the melting pot and the accepting of wretched refuse, were actually just Jewish propaganda. Above all, the biggest bulwark in the Jewish propaganda repertoire is the Holocaust.

Mark Hetfield wants every White American to feel guilty about the six million. If only America hadn’t been so racist and closed to non-Whites, the Nazis would have had no one to gas! According to people like Hetfield, the only way Americans can attempt to make up for this is to throw open the borders and let everyone in. This goes for all White countries. Not that doing so will expunge the wrongs of the past. The stain of Holocaust guilt can never be washed away. It is a wrong that can never be made right, but that shouldn’t stop you from trying, goyim. So get on your knees, assume the position and prepare for YOUR holocaust…immigration.